Macro Economics Exam Tips Archives - Mumbai University Idol

Macro Economics Exam Tips

M.COM PART 1, MACROECONOMIC, Question Bank

M.com question papers with answers pdf mumbai university | M.com sem 2 macro economics question paper

 SEMESTER – II MACROECONOMIC  8. Explain the criticisms of HDI. ANS: The Human Development Index has been criticized for failing to include any ecological considerations, focusing exclusively on national performance and ranking (although many national Human Development Reports, looking at sub-national performance, have been published by UNDP and others—so this last claim is untrue), not paying much attention to development from a global perspective and based on grounds of measurement error of the underlying statistics and formula changes by the UNDP which can lead to severe misclassifications of countries in the categories of being a ‘low’, ‘medium’, ‘high’ or ‘very high’ human development country. Economists Hendrik Wolff, Howard Chong and Maximilian Auffhammer discuss the HDI from the perspective of data error in the underlying health, education and income statistics used to construct the HDI. They identify three sources of data error which are due to (i) data updating, (ii) formula revisions and (iii) thresholds to classify a country’s development status and find that 11%, 21% and 34% of all countries can be interpreted as currently misclassified in the development bins due to the three sources of data error, respectively. The authors suggest that the United Nations should discontinue the practice of classifying countries into development bins because the cut-off values seem arbitrary, can provide incentives for strategic behavior in reporting official statistics, and have the potential to misguide politicians, investors, charity donators and the public at large which use the HDI. In 2010 the UNDP reacted to the criticism and updated the thresholds to classify nations as low, medium and high human development countries. In a comment to The Economist in early January 2011, the Human Development Report Office responded to a January 6, 2011 article in The Economist which discusses the Wolff et al. paper. The Human Development Report Office states that they undertook a systematic revision of the methods used for the calculation of the HDI and that the new methodology directly addresses the critique by Wolff et al. in that it generates a system for continuous updating of the human development categories whenever formula or data revisions take place. Some common criticisms of the HDI are as follows: 1. It is a redundant measure that adds little to the value of the individual measures composing it. 2. It is a means to provide legitimacy to arbitrary weightings of a few aspects of social development. 3. It is a number producing a relative ranking which is useless for inter-temporal comparisons, and difficult to compare a country’s progress or regression since the HDI for a country in each year depends on the levels of, say, life expectancy or GDP per capita of other countries in that year. However, each year, UN member states are listed and ranked according to the computed HDI. If high, the rank in the list can be easily used as a means of national aggrandizement; alternatively, if low, it can be used to highlight national insufficiencies. Ratan Lal Basu criticizes the HDI concept from a completely different angle. According to him the Amartya Sen-Mahbub ulHaq concept of HDI considers that provision of material amenities alone would bring about Human Development, but Basu opines that Human Development in the true sense should embrace both material and moral development. According to him human development based on HDI alone, is similar to dairy farm economics to improve dairy farm output. To quote: ‘so human development effort should not end up in amelioration of material deprivations alone: it must undertake to bring about spiritual and moral development to assist the biped to become truly human.’ For example, a high suicide rate would bring the index down. A few authors have proposed alternative indices to address some of the index’s shortcomings. However, of those proposed alternatives to the HDI, few have produced alternatives covering so many countries, and that no development index (other than, perhaps, Gross Domestic Product per capita) has been used so extensively—or effectively, in discussions and developmental planning as the HDI.   Macroeconomics m.com semester 2  important question bank pdf m.com semester 2 Macroeconomics important question bank pdf macro economics m.com part 1 question papers with answers idol mcom sem 2 macro economics question paper with Answers mcom sem 2 macro economics question paper m.com question papers with answers pdf mumbai university mumbai university solved question papers download pdf m.com part 1 question papers with answers idol mumbai university question papers download pdf m.com question paper mumbai university mumbai university previous year question papers with solutions mumbai university old question papers mumbai university solved question papers download pdf macro economics If you want exam most important question bank pdf then you have to pay per subject 100/- rupees only .  Contact 8652719712 / 8779537141      Telegram Group Mumbai Univeersity :- https://t.me/mumbaiuniversityidol   Suraj Patel Education :- https://t.me/surajpateleducation     F.Y.J.C EXAM :- https://t.me/FYJCexam   S.Y.J.C EXAM :- https://t.me/SYJCexam   F.Y EXAM :- https://t.me/fyexam     S.Y EXAM :- https://t.me/syexam     T.Y EXAM :- https://t.me/tyexam     M.Com Part 1 EXAM :- https://t.me/McomPart1Exam   M.Com Part 2 EXAM :- https://t.me/McomPart2Exam M.A EXAM :- https://t.me/mastudentsexam  YouTube Channel  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv8JIY58xfWHUIXVu9wxNHw       Best Other MCQ   Webside www.mumbaiuniversityidol.com  All Subject MCQ Link   

M.COM PART 1, MACROECONOMIC, Question Bank

Macro economics m.com part 1 question papers with answers idol

 SEMESTER – II MACROECONOMIC     5.   Explain the concept of purchasing power parity income ANS: The purchasing power parity theory of exchange rate determination was put forward by Professor Gustav Cassel of Sweden in the year 1920. There are two versions of the PPP theory known as the absolute and the relative versions. According to the absolute version, the exchange rate between two currencies should be equal to the ratio of the price indexes in the two countries. The formula for the absolute versions of the theory is as follows: RAB = PA/PB Here, RAB is the exchange rate between two countries A and B and ‘P’ refers to the price index. The absolute version is not used because it ignores transportation costs and other factors which hinder trade, non-traded goods, capital flows and real purchasing power. The relative version which is widely used by Economists can be illustrated as follows. Let us assume that India and the United States are on inconvertible paper standard and the domestic purchasing power of $1 in the US is equal to Rs.45 in India. The exchange rate would therefore be $1 = Rs.45. Assuming the price levels in both the countries to be constant, if the exchange rate moves to $1 = Rs.40, it would mean that less rupees are required to buy the same bundle of goods in India as compared to $1 in the US. It means that the US dollar is overvalued and the Indian Rupee is undervalued. Appreciation of the rupee will discourage exports and encourage imports in India. As a result, the demand for USD will increase and that of INR will fall till the PPP exchange rate is restored at $1 = Rs.45. Conversely, if the exchange rate moves to $1 = Rs.50, the INR is overvalued and the USD is undervalued. This will encourage exports and discourage imports till once again the PPP exchange rate is restored. According to the PPP theory, the exchange rate between two countries is determined at a point of equality between the respective purchasing powers of the two currencies. The PPP exchange rate is a moving par which changes with the changes in the price level. To calculate the equilibrium exchange rate under the relative version of the theory, the following formula is used: PA1 ∕ PA0                             R = R0 × ————— PB1∕ PB0 Where 0     =       base period, 1       =       period one, A&B =       Countries A and B. P       =       Price Index. R0     =       Exchange rate in the base period. Assuming the price index of Country ‘A’ (India) to be 100 in the base period and 300 in period one and that of United States to be 100 and 200 in the two periods respectively and the Original exchange rate to be Rs.40, the new PPP exchange rate would be as follows:                300∕ 100       300     100      3 R=40 × ————— = —— × —— = — = 1.5 = Rs.60 200 ∕ 100      100     200      2 Thus Rs.60/- or $1 = INR 60 will be the new PPP exchange rate. However, the PPP exchange rate will be modified by the cost of transporting goods including duties, insurance, banking and other charges. These costs are the limits within which the exchange rate can fluctuate given the demand supply situation. These limits are the ‘upper limit’ or the commodity export point and the ‘lower limit’ or the commodity import point. Critical Assessment of the PPP Exchange Rate Theory. The PPP theory is criticized on the following grounds: 1.  Price Indices of Two Countries are not comparable. The base year of indices in two countries may be different. The consumption basket may also be different. The PPP rate may not therefore give an accurate exchange rate based on the relative purchasing powers of any two currencies.  2.  Base Year is Indeterminate. The theory assumes that the balance of payments is in equilibrium in the base year. It is difficult to find the base year in which the balance of payment was in equilibrium.  3. Capital Mobility Influences the Price Level. The theory assumes that there is no capital mobility. The general price level does not affect items such as insurance, shipping, banking transactions etc. However, these items influence the exchange rate. 4. Changes in the Exchange Rate affects the General Price Level. When the exchange rate depreciates, the domestic price level is influenced by the rise in import prices. Demand for exports increases, thereby raising the price of export goods. Conversely, when the exchange rate appreciates, exports are affected and imports become cheaper, thus bringing about a fall in the price level. 5. Laissez Faire does not exist. The theory is based on the policy of laissez-faire. However, laissez faire does not exist. International trade is greatly influenced by restrictive and protective trade policies. Non-market forces therefore influence the exchange rate.  6. Elasticity of Reciprocal Demand influences Exchange Rates. According to Keynes, the theory neglects the influence of elasticity of reciprocal demand. The exchange rate is not only determined by relative prices but also by the elasticity of reciprocal demand between trading countries.  7. Changes in the Demand for Imports and Exports influence Exchange Rate. The exchange rate is not determined by purchasing power parity alone. The demand for imports and exports also influence exchange rate. If the demand for imports rise, purchasing power parity remaining constant, the exchange rate will rise and vice versa. Conclusion In spite of the limitations, the PPP exchange rate theory is widely used in development economics to ascertain the real level of development of an economy. The theory is therefore useful and PPP exchange rate is therefore a useful macroeconomic tool. Haberler in support of the theory says that, “While the price levels of different countries diverge, their price systems are nevertheless interrelated and interdependent, although the relation need not be that of equality. Moreover, supporters of the theory are quite right in contending that the exchanges can always be established at any desired level of appropriate changes in the volume of money.     NATIONAL INCOME CONCEPTS GNP, GDP & NDP A)  GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT (GNP) The GNP is the most widely used measure of national income. It is the basic

Scroll to Top